The study therefore contributes to the larger objective of building a tentative formula of humour for the relevant periods. The latter factor has significant implications in light of the notion of the worldview, which is consequently expected to be at least partly different in the given time periods. The present study hypothesises that, while following the general principle of script violation and overlap, the two sitcoms will tend to focus on the construction and realisation of different scripts. The outcome of the violation becomes manifest through the overlap of two partly or fully incompatible scripts. Grounded in Raskin's (1985) script-based semantic theory of humour (SSTH), the analysis stems from the basic notion of the script, that is, a set of semantic meanings first constructed in a given excerpt of a text and then violated in a certain way, thereby producing a humorous effect. Hence, the initial assumption is that the two series pursue different types of humour. These sitcoms are known as landmarks, each characterising a certain time period in American cultural history: the most initial period (I Love Lucy) and the recent one (Modern Family). The present study explores the manifestation of humour in two American TV situational comedy (sit-com) series: I Love Lucy (1951-1957) and Modern Family (2009 to present).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |